Verdeseo

What`s the deal with dams in the Chilean Patagonia?


VerDeseo wants to engage and inform a wider audience about what is currently happening in Chile in the context of the recent approval of the HidroAysén mega hydroelectric project. The project consists in the development of 5 mega-dams in the Aysén Region, part of the Chilean Patagonia. Although the proponents have tried by all means to convince Chileans that the project is necessary, because Chile needs energy to feed economic growth and become a “developed” country, it is known that the energy is not for households. The energy is for mining companies, many of them big transnational corporations that are not leaving anything in the country but pollution and conflicts with local populations.

There is a large amount of information that makes absolutely clear that this decision was politically informed and previous to any real environmental assessment taken. Pressure from big companies (and business elites) made public services to change their observations and approve a not only controversial, but also a cynic project, that separated its dam project from the transmission line project (that would be the longest transmission line in the world, travelling more than 2.000 km to bring the electricity to the Centre and North of the country).

The project will change a pristine and unique landscape forever, but it will also mean that the concentration of wealth and economic power of only two companies (ENDESA and Colbún) will be dramatically increased. In Chile there is no explicit energy policy. It is supposed to be dictated by the “market rules” established the undemocratic Pinochet rule. This is why a historically citizenry coalition formed in Chile (Patagonia Sin Represas), organized a campaign against this project.

Polls also indicate that the majority of the population does not want HidroAysén (more than 60% opposes the project). After the approval of this project on the 9th May 2011 more than 30.000 people went to the streets to protest, and there have been rallies all over the country. These are historic events; an environmental controversy is being the opportunity for a wider outcry for more democracy, participation and transparency.

Below you will find important information about this project and the arguments that explain why it is not a good project for the country and the Chilean people, but, as usual, a good business for a few. We have also attached a letter that Chileans living in Melbourne sent to their authorities as a way of protesting about these decisions. You can also be part of this by writing to our authorities and showing your support.

INFORMATION AND MATERIALS

Here you will find material from International Rivers, the most relevant overseas’ partner of the local campaign. You can download:

1. A PDF document that contains a brief factsheet that explains the conflict HERE. .

2. A document HERE that contains:

– A quick description of the dam project;

– An editorial from The New York Times about the campaign;

– A short article about the environmental impact study presented by the corporation;

– A short article about a study prepared by academics offering alternatives to HidroAysén;

– Maps of the proposed sites for the 5 dams.

LINKS

In this link you will find a useful slideshow:

http://www.internationalrivers.org/en/latin-america/patagonia/slideshow-wild-refuge-under-attack

Here you will find an article at the Outside Magazine that includes great material:

http://outsideonline.com/outside/destinations/201006/chile-patagonia-dams-1.html

LETTER TO CHILEAN AUTHORITIES

Dear Chilean Authorities in Australia,

We are a group of Chileans living in Melbourne. Through this letter we express our discontent and rejection to the approval of the HidroAysén Project. Our position is based in: the inadequate Environmental Impact Assessment, the social and ecological impacts of this project at the local and national levels; and above all, the short-run based development and energy policy model existing in Chile.

The HidroAysén Project presents serious faults in the evaluation, mitigation and compensation of the impacts to aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity, hydrogeology, national parks and local communities’ rights violations, to just mention some. Questionings about these issues have been expressed in multiple occasions by competent organisms, be they public services, non-governmental organizations or scholars from different disciplines. For instance, it is absurd that the five planned dams are evaluated in an independent process and before the transmission line that will travel 2,300 km from Cochrane to Santiago. This demonstrates a non-existent integral vision of our national territory and of the synergic effects that a project of this magnitude could have. We do not understand how our Environmental Evaluation System allows these kinds of processes, without demanding the project to be evaluated in its totality. The latter is the reflection of a deficient institutional set up and a non-appropriate environmental legislation, which does not adjust to our country’s reality.

An example of the deficient environmental impact assessment is the affirmation that the 2,000 workers will remain in camps, without generating positive or negative impacts in neighbouring communities. Experience with minor dams construction, such as the Ancoa or La Paloma dams, show that this is not the case. In addition, collective negotiation in the affected communities was not allowed, and it is not specified where they will be relocated.

More serious is that the project did not incorporate any of the almost 11,000 observations that citizens presented to the correspondent institutional instance. The latter demonstrates that the existing environmental legislation does not allow for effective public participation and engagement in the Environmental Impact Assessment process. The lack of dialog and of real participation denied any possibility of consensus-building processes and modifications in order to generate a socially acceptable project. The latter is reflected in that more than 50% of the Chilean population rejects the project.

When it is estimated that in order to sustain our current life style we need more than two planets Earth, than it seem not logic that Chile insists in a development model that it is not viable in the long run. Chilean Patagonia is more than a natural resource, is part of our natural and cultural heritage. It is one of the few ecosystems in the country that has not been significantly perturbed. In there, innumerable endemic species inhabit, which in addition to their intrinsic value, maintain the ecological stability in the region, and why not, in the Earth. The Patagonia is the natural habitat of Chilean emblem species; it sustains a culture with traditions and values that deserve to be preserved. This is more than our heritage; it is also the heritage of our children and grandchildren. That is why we ask our authorities to reconsider these decisions that an important part of the citizenry disapprove.

Many of the ones signing this letter are postgraduate students (some recipients of Chilean Scholarships Program Becas Chile) from various disciplines. Our studies and experience demonstrate that other development and management models for our natural resources are possible. In order to achieve a sustainable development we require uncoupling the economic growth from the energetic demand of the country. This can be achieved with a long run energy strategy that promotes efficiency and non-polluting renewable energies. A probe that HidroAysén does not respond to a long run policy is that the last 3rd of May the Minister for Energy announced the establishment of an Advisory Committee for the Energetic Development. Chilean energy development must respond to a country strategy; it cannot be exposed to the swings of the market or to the private profit interests.

Beyond the approval of certain dam or thermoelectric plant, the relevant question is: what is the country that we want to build and inherit to the future generations? We aspire to develop our country in a sustainable way. This requires an energy policy accordingly. That is why we ask to our representatives, to our authorities, to search for innovative solutions that take into consideration the long run, and reconciles the social and ecological needs of Chile.

DOWNLOAD HERE THE ORIGINAL LETTER (IN SPANISH)

Chilean Consulate in Sydney

44 Market Street, 18th Floor, Office Nº 1803, Sydney, NSW 2000

Phone: (61-2) 9299 2533 / (61-2) 9299 2862

Fax: (61-2) 9299 2868

E-mail: cgsydney@optusnet.com.au 

Chilean Consulate in Melbourne

390 St. Kilda Road, 13th Floor, Melbourne, VIC 3004

Phone: (61-3) 9866 4041

Fax:  (61-3) 9866 7977

E-mail: cgmelbourne@chile.com.au

Chilean Embassy in Canberra

10 Culgoa Circuit O’Malley, Canberra, ACT 2606

Embassy: (02) 6286 2098 / (02) 6286 2430

Consular Office: (02) 6286 4027

E-mail: embassy@chile.net.auconsulado@chile.net.au

  1. I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good.
    I do not know who you are but definitely you are going to a famous blogger if you aren’t already 😉 Cheers!

  2. Colombina

    Not really. If someone wants to use our content, it´s ok with us. The only requirement is to quote VerDeseo as the source with a link to our website. We believe in the free flow of information. We haven´t had problems so far.

Responder

Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de WordPress.com

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de WordPress.com. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Google+ photo

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Google+. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Conectando a %s

A %d blogueros les gusta esto: